DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4123-zPages: 1-15

Diagnostic performance of choline PET for detection of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

1. Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Clinic of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT Center, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale

2. Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Health Technology Assessment Unit

3. Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Clinical Trial Unit

4. Lausanne University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

5. Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Department of Biophysics and Nuclear Medicine

6. University of Strasbourg/CNRS (UMR 7357) and FMTS, Faculty of Medicine, ICube

7. Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine

8. University Hospital Zurich, Department of Nuclear Medicine

Correspondence to:
Giorgio Treglia
Tel: +41 918118919
Email: giorgio.treglia@eoc.ch

Close

Abstract

Purpose

Hyperparathyroidism (HPT) is a common endocrine disorder caused by hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands (HP). The correct detection and localization of HP is challenging but crucial, as it may guide surgical treatment, particularly in patients with primary HPT. There is a growing body of data regarding the role of radiolabelled choline positron emission tomography (PET) in this setting. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of this method in detecting HP in patients with HPT.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive computer literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases for studies published through May 2018 was performed using the following search algorithm: (a) “choline” or “fluorocholine” or “F-choline” or “C-choline” or “FCH” or “CH” or “FECH” or “FMCH” and (b) “PET” or “positron emission tomography” and (c) “parathyroid” or “hyperparathyroidism”. The diagnostic performance of radiolabelled choline PET was expressed as sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) on a per-patient and per-lesion basis and as detection rate (DR) on a per-patient basis, with pooled proportion and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) obtained using a random-effects model.

Results

Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review. Fourteen articles (517 patients) were selected for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis provided the following results on a per-patient analysis analysis: sensitivity 95% (95% CI: 92–97%), PPV 97% (95% CI: 95–98%) and DR 91% (95% CI: 87–94%). On a per-lesion analysis, pooled sensitivity and PPV were 92% (95% CI: 88–96) and 92% (95% CI: 89–95%), respectively. No significant heterogeneity was found among the selected studies.

Conclusions

Radiolabelled choline PET demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance in detecting HP in patients with HPT. Large multicentre studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to better define the role of this imaging method in this setting.

To access the full text, please Sign in

If you have institutional access, please click here

  • Accepted: Aug 1, 2018
  • Online: Aug 9, 2018

Article Tools

eanm
EJNMMI Ad